Revolutionary Road, the movie

I posted about
the book
a few weeks ago, and said I wasn’t going to bother
with the movie, but I watched it last night anyway.

It was actually better than I expected. Kate Winslett is
pretty good, although I still kept seeing January Jones from Mad
Men instead. As I expected, Leonardo DaCaprio’s matinée
idol good looks aren’t really right for Frank. And of course,
they don’t have anything like as much good detail in a 2-hour
movie as in a 300 page book.

For instance, the first scene in the book, which really grabs
the reader, goes into a great amount of detail about why the
production of Bus Stop that April stars in is such
a flop in spite of all the hard work that a lot of people did.
The movie skips all that and goes straight to the audience
reaction.

Another scene that’s especially good in the book and left out
of the movie was when April cleans all the dirtiest parts of the
house before botching the abortion.

I wasn’t especially impressed with the costumes and scenery,
but the sound track was definitely an addition.

Michael Shannon,
who plays the mentally ill son of the real estate lady was
especially good in a fairly difficult role.

So on the whole, read the book or watch Mad Men if
you really want period melodrama, but if you’ve done that and
still want some more, it’s not a terrible movie.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0307454622&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B0016Q2D66&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B000YABIQ6&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B001GCUER0&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

Sonia Sotomayor

I’ve been reading the discussion of Sonia Sotomayor’s
nomination to be a justice of the Supreme court with more interest
than I sometimes read such things. She’s roughly my age, and it
still surprises me when people who seem that much like me get be
judges and presidents.

I thought I’d point you at two of the more interesting articles
I’ve run into.

Slate Magazine has an article called The Invitation You Can’t Refuse —
Why Sonia Sotomayor was talking about race in the first place.

It’s written by a latina lawyer, who makes the point:

Imagine Chief Justice John Roberts being invited by members of his own cultural network to deliver remarks for the Honorable William H. Rehnquist Law & Cultural Diversity Memorial Lecture on what special qualities white men bring to the bench: “What makes your approach, as a white male, different from that of your black judicial colleagues?” “Does being a white man give you special insight into the perspective of white male defendants in discrimination cases?” “Has the presence of white men on the bench made any difference in American law?” Odds are he wouldn’t last two minutes before treading on someone’s sensibilities. But this political high-wire act is expected from minority figures as a matter of course.

This morning’s New York Times has an article comparing the
biographies of Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas called For
Sotomayor and Thomas, Paths Diverge at Race
.

Among the striking paralels drawn between these lives are that
when they arrived in college, both felt that they didn’t speak
English as well as they wanted to:

Ms. Sotomayor had grown up in the Bronx speaking Spanish; Mr. Thomas’s relatives in Pin Point, Ga., mixed English with Gullah, a language of the coastal South. Both attended Catholic school, where they were drilled by nuns in grammar and other subjects. But at college, they realized they still sounded unpolished.

Ms. Sotomayor shut herself in her dorm room and eventually resorted to grade-school grammar textbooks to relearn her syntax. Mr. Thomas barely spoke, he said later, and majored in English literature to conquer the language.

“I just worked at it,” he said in an interview years later, “on my
pronunciations, sounding out words.”

Another similarity was what happened when they were interviewed
for jobs after graduation from law school:

Mr. Thomas and Ms. Sotomayor did have one experience in common: law firm interviewers asked them if they really deserved their slots at Yale, implying that they might not have been accepted if they were white.

Ms. Sotomayor fought back so intensely — against a Washington firm, now merged with another — that she surprised even some of the school’s Hispanics. She filed a complaint with a faculty-student panel, which rejected the firm’s initial letter of apology and asked for a stronger one. Minority and women’s groups covered campus with fliers supporting her. Ms. Sotomayor eventually dropped her complaint, but the firm had already suffered a blow to its reputation.

Mr. Thomas was more private about the experience — even some friends do not recall it — but he took it hard. With rejection letters piling up, he feared he would not be able to support his wife and young son.

The problem, Mr. Thomas concluded, was affirmative action. Whites would not hire him, he concluded, because no one believed he had attended Yale on his own merits. He felt acute betrayal: his education was supposed to put him on equal footing, but he was not offered the jobs that his white classmates were getting. He saved the pile of rejection letters, he said in a speech years later.

“It was futile for me to suppose that I could escape the stigmatizing
effects of racial preference,” he wrote in his autobiography.

I certainly hope they get the confirmation process over in time
so that it doesn’t interfere with fixing health care and the
economy, but meanwhile, it’s producing some interesting writing.

New Serpent Publications Website

It’s been a busy week, but the new Serpent Publications website is starting to be
ready for friendly eyes.

There’s still a lot of page content to be written or
transferred from the old site, and I’ll be tinkering with the look
of the pages and fixing up broken links and such in the
database, but the music is all there and can be accessed from the By Composer page.

The piece that’s a test for the new piece pages with previews
is
Douce
Memoir.
It needs some editing; someone asked for it and it was a mess, and I got it converted to current lilypond, but haven’t finished fixing the underlay.

It’s conceivable that I’ll even be ready to go live to the
world at large by Wednesday.

More about what I’ve been doing later, but let me know what you
think.

MP3 from Wednesday’s West Gallery Quire concert

I said yesterday that I didn’t have a recording I could let you
hear. That is no longer true. Here’s a short MP3 from the
concert.

The piece is Arise and Hail the Joyful Day,
which is one of the Christmas tunes from this repertoire. We did
it as the opening number, and then did two verses as an encore.
This is the version from the encore.

You can see the contrast between the serpent, which plays the
bass line throughout, and the sackbut, which is on the tenor line
for the last verse.

West Gallery Quire Concert

I played serpent with the West Gallery Quire last
night, in a concert at the Brighton-Allston Congregational
Church.

It was a very pleasant audience, and the group really enjoyed
playing for them and eating together afterwards.

I don’t have any pictures, and I don’t think anyone wants me to
let you hear the rehearsal recordings. But I’m feeling pretty
good about the serpent playing.

To begin with, the church is a really good room for the serpent
to play in. And the tuba playing I’ve been doing the last couple
of weeks to get ready for the Wakefield Summer Band has gotten my
low range much more reliable than it sometimes is.

I think historically, there would have usually been at most one
instrument per part, and the usual kind of church choir
distribution, modified by some of the social dynamics described in
the quote below. And the instruments would have been fairly loud
instruments that could be depended on by the singers.

This group tends to be about half instruments, some of whom are
playing for their personal pleasure, and can maybe be heard by the
person next to them, but not by anyone else. Last night, we
really could have used another soprano. The serpent was loud
enough that having only two bass singers wasn’t a balance problem,
but it’s more fun when the serpent can blend into a section.

Another issue with this group is that the director doesn’t
really ever read the words of the hymns, so he’s always deciding
what verses to sing on some pretty arbitrary criteria. Last night
we sang the 23rd Psalm in the Old Version of Sternhold and
Hopkins. (I’d give you a link, but the site I found seems to be
down.) It has 5 verses, and we sang 4 of them. Several of us
lobbied for doing all 5, since it’s a well-known text, and it
seems to be left hanging if you end on verse 4. But the director
had decided that 4 verses was the right number, and it didn’t even
occur to him that he should read all 5 and decide on the basis of
the poetry which was the right one to leave out.

Literary reference

Since we’re talking about West Gallery Music, I found a
literary reference a couple of years ago that I think describes
the milieu and its destruction better and more succinctly than the
Thomas Hardy Under the Greenwood Tree chapters that
are always cited. Thomas Hardy is certainly a better writer than
Thomas Hughes, but I think this excerpt should be available on the
web for people who want to read about West Gallery Music.

It’s from Tom Brown at Oxford by Thomas Hughes, which you can now get
in a number of formats from manybooks.net.

This is from CHAPTER XVIII

ENGLEBOURNE VILLAGE

The figure of fun was a middle-aged man of small stature, and very
bandy-legged, dressed in a blue coat and brass buttons, and carrying a
great bass-viol bigger than himself, in a rough baize cover. He came out
of a footpath into the road just before them, and, on seeing them,
touched his hat to Miss Winter, and then fidgeted along with his load,
and jerked his head in a deprecatory manner away from them as he walked
on, with the sort of look and action which a favorite terrier uses when
his master holds out a lighted cigar to his nose. He was the village
tailor and constable, also the principal performer in the church-music
which obtained in Englebourn. In the latter capacity he had of late come
into collision with Miss Winter.

For this was another of the questions which divided the parish–The
great church music question. From time immemorial, at least ever since
the gallery at the west end had been built, the village psalmody had
been in the hands of the occupiers of that Protestant structure. In the
middle of the front row sat the musicians, three in number, who played
respectively a bass-viol, a fiddle, and a clarionet. On one side of them
were two or three young women, who sang treble–shrill, ear-piercing
treble–with a strong nasal Berkshire drawl in it. On the other side of
the musicians sat the blacksmith, the wheelwright, and other tradesmen
of the place. Tradesmen means in that part of the country what we mean
by artisan, and these were naturally allied with the laborers, and
consorted with them. So far as church-going was concerned, they formed a
sort of independent opposition, sitting in the gallery, instead of in
the nave, where the farmers and the two or three principal
shopkeepers–the great landed and commercial interests–regularly sat
and slept, and where the two publicans occupied pews, but seldom made
even the pretence of worshipping.

The rest of the gallery was filled by the able-bodied male
peasantry. The old worn-out men generally sat below in the free seats;
the women also, and some few boys. But the hearts of these latter were
in the gallery–a seat on the back benches of which was a sign that they
had indued the toga virilis, and were thenceforth free from maternal and
pastoral tutelage in the matter of church-going. The gallery thus
constituted had gradually usurped the psalmody as their particular and
special portion of the service; they left the clerk and the school
children, aided by such of the aristocracy below as cared to join, to do
the responses; but, when singing time came, they reigned supreme. The
slate on which the Psalms were announced was hung out from before the
centre of the gallery, and the clerk, leaving his place under the
reading-desk, marched up there to give them out. He took this method of
preserving his constitutional connection with the singing, knowing that
otherwise he could not have maintained the rightful position of his
office in this matter. So matters had stood until shortly before the
time of our story.

The present curate, however, backed by Miss Winter, had tried a
reform. He was a quiet man, with a wife and several children, and small
means. He had served in the diocese ever since he had been ordained, in
a hum-drum sort of way, going where he was sent for, and performing his
routine duties reasonably well, but without showing any great aptitude
for his work. He had little interest, and had almost given up expecting
promotion, which he certainly had done nothing particular to merit. But
there was one point on which he was always ready to go out of his way,
and take a little trouble. He was a good musician, and had formed choirs
at all his former curacies.

Soon after his arrival, therefore, he, in concert with Miss Winter, had
begun to train the children in church-music. A small organ, which had
stood in a passage in the Rectory for many years, had been repaired, and
appeared first at the schoolroom, and at length under the gallery of the
church; and it was announced one week to the party in possession, that,
on the next Sunday, the constituted authorities would take the
church-music into their own hands. Then arose a strife, the end of which
had nearly been to send the gallery off, in a body, headed by the
offended bass-viol, to the small red-brick little Bethel at the other
end of the village. Fortunately the curate had too much good sense to
drive matters to extremities, and so alienate the parish constable, and
a large part of his flock, though he had not tact or energy enough to
bring them round to his own views. So a compromise was come to; and the
curate’s choir were allowed to chant the Psalms and Canticles, which had
always been read before, while the gallery remained triumphant masters
of the regular Psalms.

Here the ladies turned in, and were going up the walk towards the school
door, when the constable summoned up courage to speak on the matter
which was troubling him, and, resting the bass-viol carefully on his
right foot, calling out after them,

“Oh, please marm! Miss Winter!”

“Well,” she said quietly, turning round, “what do you wish to say?”

“Why, please mann, I hopes as you don’t think I be any ways unked ’bout
this here quire singin’, as they calls it I’m sartin you knows as there
ain’t amost nothing I wouldn’t do to please ee.”

“Well, you know how to do it very easily,” she said when he paused. “I
don’t ask you even to give up your music and try to work with us, though
I think you might have done that. I only ask you to use some psalms and
tunes which are fit to be used in a church.”

“To be sure us ool. ‘Taint we as wants no new-fangled tunes; them as we
sings be aal owld ones as ha’ been used in our church ever since I can
mind. But you only choose thaay as you likes out o’ the book? and we be
ready to kep to thaay.”

“I think Mr. Walker made a selection for you some weeks ago,” said Miss
Winter; “did he not?”

“‘Ees, but ’tis narra mossel o’ use for we to try his ‘goriums and sich
like. I hopes you wun’t be offended wi’ me, miss, for I be telling
nought but truth.” He spoke louder as they got nearer to the school
door, and, as they were opening it, shouted his last shot after them,
“‘Tis na good to try thaay tunes o’ his’n, miss. When us praises God, us
likes to praise un joyful.”

“There, you hear that, Mary,” said Miss Winter. “You’ll soon begin to
see why I look grave. There never was such a hard parish to
manage. Nobody will do what they ought. I never can get them to do
anything. Perhaps we may manage to teach the children better, that’s my
only comfort.”

“But, Katie dear, what do the poor things sing? Psalms, I hope.”

“Oh yes, but they choose all the odd ones on purpose, I believe. Which
class will you take?”

The little choir of children sang admirably, led by the schoolmistress,
and Miss Winter and the curate exchanged approving glances. They
performed the liveliest chant in their collection, that the opposition
might have no cause to complain of their want of joyfulness. And in turn
Miss Winter was in hopes that, out of deference to her, the usual rule
of selection in the gallery might have been modified. It was with no
small annoyance, therefore, that, after the Litany was over, and the
tuning finished, she heard the clerk give out that they would praise God
by singing part of the ninety-first Psalm. Mary, who was on the tiptoe
of expectation as to what was coming, saw the curate give a slight shrug
with his shoulders and lift of his eyebrows as he left the reading-desk,
and in another minute it became a painful effort for her to keep from
laughing as she slyly watched her cousin’s face; while the gallery sang
with vigour worthy of any cause or occasion–

“On the old lion He shall go, The adder fell and long; On the young lion
tread also, With dragons stout and strong.”

The trebles took up the last line, and repeated–

“With dragons stout and strong;”

and then the whole strength of the gallery chorused again–

“With dra-gons stout and strong;”

and the bass-viol seemed to her to prolong the notes and to gloat over
them as he droned them out, looking triumphantly at the distant
curate. Mary was thankful to kneel down to compose her face. The first
trial was the severe one, and she got through the second psalm much
better; and by the time Mr. Walker had plunged fairly into his sermon
she was a model of propriety and sedateness again.

Why not to use AOL

I’m sure everyone who runs a mail server already knows this,
but clearly all the thousands or millions of people who use AOL,
including a number of my personal friends, do not.

This is addressing only the problem of the AOL mail delivery
service. I know there have been other problems with AOL in the
past; I don’t know or especially care about the current status of
those problems.

I also know that the people who are using AOL are doing it because
they haven’t actually done any research about the alternatives. So
while I don’t know anything about the price of using
AOL versus the alternatives, I strongly suspect that they don’t
either, which suggests that AOL is probably using this ignorance
to get away with charging more than the alternatives.

The reason to not use AOL to deliver your mail is that they
have an official corporate policy of not caring whether your mail
is delivered or not.

When they get one spam report about anyone in your
domain, they block all email the mentions that
domain.
If you think this sounds like something an
organization that wanted you to get mail from your friends would
do, you can stop reading now. I assure you, this policy includes,
and is often applied to, very large and famous and frequently
referenced domains like harvard.edu.

They currently have laymusic.org blocked. My
normal method for sending email uses this domain in the Sender, From,
Reply-to, and signature of my emails, so I have to do something
radically different from usual to not mention laymusic.org in my
emails.

It took
me a while to remember the magic for finding out where to report
this. If you try going to postmaster.aol.com, you have
to be a better documentation reader than I am (I used to make lots
of money being a good documentation reader)
to figure out what
to do from what they tell you there.

If you run your own webserver, the mail log gets the bounce
response from AOL which includes a URL to go to to fill out a form
asking them to stop bouncing your mail.

I used to run my own, but when I finally decided not to depend
on Verizon being able to fix anything for my internet access, I
had to give up my static IP address, which means that while I can
get dynamic dns and refer to my address by name instead of number, I can’t get what’s called reverse
dns (being able to go from the address to the name), which means lots of places (even ones that really want their
customers to get their mail) will bounce my mail if I use a server
on my machine, so I’m using the comcast server. Comcast doesn’t
pass on the bounce information from their logs in the bounce
message.

So the trick to find out where to go to tell AOL to debounce
your domain is to send a mail from gmail, which will put the
information from the log into the bounce message they send you.
Then you go to that URL and fill out your form. I did this last
Fall, and my domain was unbounced in a small number of days.

This Spring, this hasn’t happened yet. They asked me to fill
out a customer satisfaction survey this morning, and this is what
I wrote:

I reported that email from or referring to my domain was bouncing on May 21.

I was told that the problem had been resolved and mail would stop bouncing in “24 business hours” from then on May 27.

The mail is still bouncing on June 3.

I think your policy of bouncing all mail that mentions a given domain name based on one spam complaint about that domain is not the policy of an organization that wants to deliver the mail.

Your performance on resolving such a block is not the performance of
an organization that wants to resolve problems.

Then when I submitted the form I wrote that on, they said they
couldn’t count my survey because they didn’t think my verification
number (which I’d gotten in the mail this morning) was valid.

Even if you think AOL is the best way to get internet access,
you should still have some other way to get email. gmail,
hotmail, and yahoo will all give you an account for free, and many
organizations and universities will give you an account if you’re
a member or an alumnus/a. Even if you currently have a good isp,
you should still have a mail address that doesn’t depend on its
name, because it’s likely to change its name or go out of business
or become a not-so-good isp for you, and you’ll have to change
your email if that happens.

Netflix Watch Now

I put a fair amount of effort after getting my new TV into
having a computer that could use it as a monitor.

I expected to run MythTV on it. I did in
fact once have MythTV set up to record off-the-air shows for
playing later, but I reinstalled because something else wasn’t
working right, and really haven’t felt the
need to set it up again.

You do get better results from mythtv than you do from
hulu.com, but hulu.com is a lot less trouble, and seems to get
most of the things I want to watch on over-the-air TV.

At the moment, I’m also paying for Comcast digital TV with HD,
which is necessary if you want to watch baseball games or tennis
matches or some of the political debates, but is disappointing as a way to watch movies or tv
shows. You can find things if you work hard enough, but there
isn’t the variety of TV reruns and old movies that you would want.

But if you have a Windows computer hooked up to your TV, and a
Netflix account only a
couple of dollars a month more expensive than the cheapest, and
a fast broadband connection, you
can watch an increasing number of things with the click of the
button.

I had been using it only intermittently until last week, but
last week Comcast sent me a postcard claiming they’d doubled my
connection speed, and suddenly, watching online seems about the
same quality as watching DVD’s.

I’d always assumed that when there was enough stuff available
and the quality was good enough you’d want to watch some movies
that way on the nights you wanted a movie and didn’t have a
DVD. This saves you paying for more DVD’s at a time than you’re
generally going to watch.

But it turns out that what it’s really good for is when you
come home tired and want to watch a comedy for a bit before
going to bed. I’ve been watching the first season of 30 Rock, which I didn’t get hooked on at the
time. It’s really a lot easier than channel surfing on the
cable box (which is unnecessarily complicated), and you get
something you know you’re in the mood for.

It would probably be even more virtuous to not use TV to unwind
at the end of the day, but given that’s what I’m used to doing,
and given I’ve spent all the money anyway, this seems like the
way to do it.

I don’t recommend spending lots of money just to get this, but
if like me you’re paying for a fast internet connection for
other reasons, it might be worth paying netflix and setting up
an old computer so you can do this.

Using a different browser

Until the recent urge to upgrade my computing
environment
, I was using firefox as my
main browser. This was not because it’s a particularly good
program, but because it has managed to get enough market share
away from Internet Explorer that the people who design
websites test on it. There are very few websites, except for
the ones that deliberately try to restrict themselves to
commercial OS’s, that don’t work on Firefox for Linux.

Unfortunately, there are at least two major problems with
Firefox on Linux, that cause me to try other things from time
to time:

  • It has major memory leaks. This means that if you keep your
    system running for weeks, or even days, at a time, after a while
    Firefox will grab enough of the memory that everything,
    including the program that draws the windows on the screen, is
    gasping for memory, and going to read the hard drive before
    drawing every pixel. I knew that killing firefox would fix
    this, but I kept not getting around to it until killing firefox
    took several minutes, because of waiting for the pixels to
    redraw.
  • Less common of a problem for me, but still a sign of an
    uncivilized program, is that once you play music with firefox,
    it grabs some sound resource, and doesn’t let it go, so the next
    time you want to run some of the other music programs I use, you
    have to kill firefox to do it. (For those who wonder, the way
    to do this is the command “alsa force-reload”. This kills all
    the programs that are holding onto resources that prevent alsa
    from reloading the modules it uses.)

Now some people claim that opera is a good
browser for their purposes. Whenever I download it and try it,
it takes me about 10 minutes before I find a site that doesn’t
work with it. I believe the site I do my online banking at is a
frequent offender, so if you have a bank that tests their online
banking with opera, maybe you don’t have my problems. But
switching banks is even harder than switching browsers, and by
most of the bank evaluation criteria I use, mine is pretty good, so
I’m not going to drop them just because their software testing
leaves something to be desired.

A lot of the other browsers for Linux are in fact using the
mozilla engine, which is the same one Firefox uses. Of course,
I don’t know exactly where in the code these memory leaks and
resource hoardings happen, but it wouldn’t surprise me if a
different browser using the same engine had the same
problems.

However, it is possible to install an alpha test version of
google’s chromium-browser for Linux. The version for windows
has been out for a few months and gotten rave reviews for being
clean and fast. The Linux version has a lot of things
that don’t work, but for the ones that do, it’s really a lot of
fun to use.

It’s a nuisance to be doing testing on alpha
software (which was pre-alpha until a few days ago). And of course I
need to restart chromium-browser every day when I get the new copy.
And do some testing to find out which things work today.
Yesterday was very exciting, because “copy link address” worked
for the first time. But today, it doesn’t seem to want to
display some slightly complicated PHP for my wordpress
administration, which it’s been doing for some time. Another
button that’s inconsistent is the “Publish” button when I
publish a new post. And of course, they aren’t even claiming
that printing or flash work. I also still haven’t reconfigured
emacs to use chromium instead of firefox, so when I click on a
URL in my email, I still get a tab in Firefox.

So I do still have to keep a copy of Firefox running, but it
usually only has one or two tabs on it, so it isn’t that much of
a nuisance if I have to restart it, and it actually behaves very
much like a civilized program if you’re closing most tabs right
after you open them.

Garden, May 31, 2009

Sad news about the Angelica

[replanted angelica]

Sunny and I went to look at the garden after our morning walk,
and the angelica wasn’t there. There was a shallow hole
instead.

I looked in the compost bin, and there it was, but all the
flower stalks were broken or smashed. I put it back, and gave
it compost and water, and maybe it will survive, but I would
guess there won’t be flowers this year.

It was looking happy after being transplanted, but of course I
dug it up carefully and took as much of the roots and soil it
was used to as I could. The vandal who put it in the compost
bin didn’t bother with that.

Here’s the email I wrote the condo association:

In the minutes to the last owners’ meeting, I wrote:

Nobody in attendance requested any changes to the existing
plot assignments.

Secretary’s note: this means that the plot formerly assigned
to Mary and Jeff is currently unassigned. I put a couple of
things there last summer when I was cleaning out my deceased
friend’s house and garden, so if you want to put anything
there, feel free, but please ask if you want to take anything
out.

Someone pulled up the angelica plant which I had carefully moved from my
deceased friend’s garden in Salem, and which was about to burst into
bloom, and put it in the compost bin.

I have replaced, it, but the bloom stalks are broken, so I don’t have
much hope for it at all, and none for this year. I am really upset; I
was looking forward to having that plant.

I think it would make sense to assign that plot, so this sort of thing
doesn’t happen in the future. If someone else wants it, I will move
both the angelica and the lavender, which is also about to bloom.
Otherwise, I will take it, and please, nobody else pull anything else
up.

I don’t understand this vandalism. Why would anyone not want a blooming
angelica in their back yard?

[angelica flower stalks]

Upset was actually putting it mildly. I was weeping
hysterically for most of an hour, and I still tear up when I
think of it. Of course, it being a condo problem, I also
started thinking about all the other things I’ve been mad at the
possible suspects about, but I’m trying to control that.

I’d probably be upset anyway, but it being one of the things I
took from Bonnie’s garden makes it worse.
That was something she put a lot of herself into, and I wanted
to save as much of it as I could. Other friends took things
too, so even if the vandals pull up both the angelica and the
lavender (I think the daylilies I put in the front yard are
already gone), there will still be some, but I won’t have
it.

Lavender

On a more cheerful note, the vandal(s) didn’t pull up the
lavender, which is also about to bloom.

[lavender]
[lavender buds]

Roses

The roses are blooming.

[roses]
[rose]

Iris

The iris and the Siberian Iris are blooming their heads off; I
cut two stem of iris for my tall blue winebottles.

[iris]
[Siberian iris]

Overall view

You can see from this that the Alliums and the lillies of the
valley are over, but there’s still a brave little pansy. I forgot
to take them, but there are drumstick alliums with buds.

[garden]

Programming again

The web application I’m trying to set up for the Serpent Publications
website is the most programming I’ve done for several years.
I made my living as a programmer for several decades, so I wasn’t
expecting it to be quite this hard to get back into it.

Part of the problem is that mysql and php aren’t what I ever did for a
living. I don’t remember the details of the vocabulary even for
what I did used to do very well, but I never knew either mysql
or PHP without a reference book.

Anyway, I was finally making progress on setting up the mysql
views this morning, and I completely forgot that I hadn’t posted
to this blog, so this is a fast one because any minute now Sunny will decide
it’s time for his walk and I’ll have to take him.

Anyway, my advice for what it’s worth, if you haven’t
programmed for a while and need to, is to go back to doing very
small things at a time. It’s generally good advice for
programming anyway — you get testability and reusability and all
kinds of good things by breaking up the job into little
pieces.

So yesterday, I wrote up a list of all the fields that should
be in the pieceinfo view of my musicpublish database.

This morning I got each of them to work individually in an
interactive environment.

Then I wrote the sql that defines the pieceinfo view, which
takes data from the piece, book, and composer tables, by way of
the Book_Pieces_Table for joining book and piece.

Another good piece of advice is to set up an interactive
environment that you’re comfortable with. The command line mysql
is pretty good, but I got farther and faster when I switched to
the emacs sql mode.

Anyway, the upshot is that I’ve got a working although minimal
CSS theme, most of the hard part of the mysql is written, so what
I mostly have to do is write some PHP (some of which I may be able
to substitute python for), and then I’ll have a subset of the
functionality that I can throw at people for testing.

I’m not really sanguine about getting the whole application
written before BEMF, but I’m
optimistic that I can get at least as much functionality as is in
the current site, with improved design for easier upgrading.