Category: General

Pride and Prejudice fanfic

After reading all that science fiction last week in order to
vote for the Hugos, I was ready for a change of pace. I picked
Pride and Prejudice (free online
version) because one of the novelettes (Pride
and Prometheus, by John Kessel)
uses characters from it, and I wanted to confirm my impression
that it directly contradicted what Jane Austen said.

The novelette continues the history of Mary and Kitty, the two
sisters who remain unmarried at the end of Pride and
Prejudice. Jane Austen says about them:

Kitty, to her very material advantage, spent the chief of her
time with her two elder sisters. In society so superior to
what she had generally known, her improvement was great. She
was not of so ungovernable a temper as Lydia; and, removed from
the influence of Lydia’s example, she became, by proper
attention and management, less irritable, less ignorant, and
less insipid. From the further disadvantage of Lydia’s society
she was of course carefully kept, and though Mrs. Wickham
frequently invited her to come and stay with her, with the
promise of balls and young men, her father would never consent
to her going.

Mary was the only daughter who remained at home; and she was
necessarily drawn from the pursuit of accomplishments by
Mrs. Bennet’s being quite unable to sit alone. Mary was
obliged to mix more with the world, but she could still
moralize over every morning visit; and as she was no longer
mortified by comparisons between her sisters’ beauty and her
own, it was suspected by her father that she submitted to
the change without much reluctance.

In the novelette, Mary and Kitty are both living with their
parents; Mrs. Bennet has given up on Mary, but is still working
hard to marry off Kitty. Mr. Kessel does pick up, as I had not,
on Kitty coughing and being generally more delicate than her
sisters. But certainly Jane Austen did not envision an affair
with a butcher’s son.

But it is interesting to note that Victor Frankenstein is a
contemporary of the Bennet sisters, and to envision Mary having
a crush on him.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0141439513&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

Walk in the woods

Yesterday, I was still in Fall River, since I went there for
the cookout on the Fourth of July, and you can’t get back to where I
live from anywhere else on the Fourth, because all the people
who come to the fireworks pretty much have to go by my house,
and it takes them until well after midnight to get away.

One of the things that’s better in Fall River than in Cambridge
is the woods, so I went for a short walk.

Unfortunately, I didn’t have my camera with me, but here’s a
picture someone else (from the Connecticut
Botanical Society site) took of the Indian Pipes I saw a lot
of.

[Indian pipe]

I can’t remember when was the last time I thought of the word
“saprophytic”.

There was also a little brown frog.

I went with my sister, and we had both her dog, who is too
energetic and we worried about losing him, and my dog, who is
getting pretty old for that kind of hiking, and we worried about
whether the gentle hills were too much for him.

[Monte]

Doggie day care in an economic crisis

One of the guests at the cookout I attended yesterday runs a day care center for dogs. You would expect the demand for this to be fairly elastic, so people were asking him how his business was responding to the economic crisis.

He said it was actually holding fairly stable. Of course there are people who’ve lost their jobs and aren’t using day care for their dogs any more. But there are also people who have two jobs or longer commutes and need it more than they did.

And there are the people who thought they should cut back and then came back two weeks later and said the day care was cheaper than reupholstering the couch. Paul said these are all married people; single people just put something over the part that needs reupholstering.

Declaration of Independence

Happy Fourth of July, if you’re someone who celebrates it.
Even if not, you might want to read the Declaration
of Independence and think about it.

In the first place, it’s a really good piece of writing. And
there are a lot of phrases and sentences that have entered the
English Language. It isn’t quite as full of quotations as the
best of Shakespeare, but it’s close:

  • the course of human Events
  • the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God
  • a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind

That’s just the first paragraph (preamble). The second
paragraph is almost more jam-packed:

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men
are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty,
and the pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights,
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers
from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new
Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and
organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most
likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed,
will dictate that Governments long established should not be
changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all
Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer,
while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing
the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of
Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object,
evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is
their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and
to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the
patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the
Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of
Government. The History of the Present King of Great-Britain is a
History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct
Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these
States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid
World.

And the last paragraph is the one that makes it such fun to
read aloud:

We, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent States; that they are absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connection between them and the State of Great-Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of the divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

One of the features that makes it such a tight piece of writing
is that it’s a syllogism:

A: When these things happen, the government should change.

B: These things have been happening.

C: The colonies are of right and ought to be free and
independent states.

Another point to consider is that, compared with many other
pieces of political propaganda, it seems to have been mostly
true. Not that some of the stories might not have been told
differently by the opponents of independence, but historians who
have looked at the question find some basis for all the “Facts” in
the document.

So you can complain, and I certainly do, about the abuses of
power in the system of government set up after this Declaration.
But it’s worth thinking about all the important revolutions
inspired by this language, probably including some minor ones in
our own biographies.

And have a good cookout or fireworks or whatever you do.

Wimbledon

I’ve been watching Wimbledon instead of reading
newspapers and listening to radio news the last couple of weeks,
so I can’t tell you anything about either Michael Jackson’s death or the
situation in Honduras.

But I thought I’d share a few thoughts about the tennis:

  • The women’s singles draw would have looked like less of a
    vast wasteland populated only by the Williams sisters if they
    had shown us some of Elena Dementieva’s matches in the early
    rounds. American TV networks have trouble believing that people
    want to see good tennis, rather than Americans playing tennis.
  • I’ve always liked Tommy Haas, and I’m glad he managed to win
    some difficult matches this year. He’s had a history of playing
    better than his ranking but then losing in 5 sets when he plays
    a higher-ranked player. But this year he won a 5-set match in
    the third round against Marin Cilic and a 4-set match in the
    quarter finals against Novak Djokovic, and played Roger Federer
    almost even on serve for two sets in the semi-finals.
  • Of
    course, one hopes that this is because he has his head together
    better and not because he’s changed his doping regime, but I
    don’t think we should be cynical about that without some
    evidence. This is of course what the tennis association hopes
    we’ll think, and the point of the article is that they’re
    refusing to test so that we won’t have any evidence to think
    with. That is, they’re testing only during the big tournaments,
    and apparently the doping that would be likely to help happens
    during training.
  • There are some good young American players coming up —
    18-year old Melanie Oudin qualified and made it to the fourth
    round, by beating sixth-seeded Jelena Jankovich in the third
    round, and the Men’s junior tournament had 3 Americans in the
    quarter-finals.
  • They really have to look at the computer program that
    determines the rankings. Nobody watching Dinara Safina (seeded first) play
    this year would believe that she should have been ranked above
    any of the next three seeds (Williams, Williams and
    Dementieva). What happens is that if you play lots of
    tournaments and get to the fourth round, it outranks playing
    fewer tournaments and winning them. And the fact that the
    Williams sisters (who play fewer tournaments) are still
    there and most of the people who’ve been ranked above them for
    the past 10 years aren’t should make them think about whether
    the rankings should be giving points for playing too much.

Hugo Award Voting

One of the things I have to do today or tomorrow is vote on who
should get the Hugo Awards.

I signed up as a supporting member of Anticipation so that I could get the
packet of nominated works as ebooks.

I’m going to discuss the novel category, since it’s the one I
most care about. I expect to read enough of some of the shorter
works to vote in some of those categories, but it’s having good
novels to read that I care most about.

Voting options

The way the voting is set up,
you rank your choices, and “No Award” is one of the
choices. So the first thing to decide about everything you read
isn’t “Should this get the award?” but rather “Would I rather
there were no award than that this should get it?”

Did you enjoy it?

This year’s field of nominees is quite strong, and they’re all
well-written, but there was one (Saturn’s Children)
that I disliked. If I were looking for a good book to read, and
picked that one up because it had won an award, I would be
annoyed at the people who gave it the award. So I’m going to
rank that one behind “No Award”.

Do you want to read another one?

The others are all books I really enjoyed reading, and I
wouldn’t feel that the voters had done me a disservice in voting
for any of them. So I have to look for some other criterion to
decide how to rank them.

I’ve decided that the next factor to consider about the effect
of an award is how it might influence the writers. So the
question here is not so much, “Did you like this book better
than the others?”, but “Do you wish other writers would write
more books like this one?”

Now obviously to some extent, each book in this genre is unique
— nobody else is going to write a book exactly like The
Graveyard Book about a child growing up
in a graveyard raised by the ghosts. But lots of people will be
writing “coming of age” narratives about a child who struggles
to overcome an unusual background and join the “normal world”.
And I will read many of them and enjoy them.

Little
Brother (Free
download) was the first of the books to occur to me as in
the category of something I was glad had been written but I
didn’t want to read again, but now I’m not so sure. Certainly I
don’t want another coming-of-age narrative where Linux and
Social Networking save the world, but another coming-of-age
narrative where the intrepid hero realizes that the world he’s
being educated for is wrong in important ways and fights to
change it could certainly be enjoyable.

Similarly, Zoe’s
Tale seems like a rewrite of all the Heinlein juveniles
where the intrepid heroine saves the world and learns martial arts, but
if you think about it, it’s been updated quite a bit. Both of
Zoe’s parents do a lot of nurturing, the discovery of the
opposite sex is a lot less embarrassing, and the characters’
dealings with aliens are interesting. I don’t mind at all that
Heinlein wrote one juvenile a year (timed to appear at
Christmas) for over a decade, and if John Scalzi wants to start
doing that too, it sounds like it should make a few people’s
Christmas buying easier. Whether they
should all win Hugo awards is another question, of course.

Old adult versus Young Adult

You may have noticed that the last three books I mentioned are
all Young Adult(YA) fiction. I don’t believe in being prejudiced
about this — many of my favorite books of all time (Little
Women to name one) would be Young Adult Fiction if they were
published today.

Anathem
is definitely not Young Adult fiction, although in a way it’s
the same kind of coming-of-age and saving the world narrative
that the YA books have. To some extent this is a disadvantage
— there really isn’t enough character and plot for a 900 page
book, and there are a number of places where this reader wished
that it had gotten the kind of editing that the YA books
did.

The acknowledgements page credits a philosophical lineage
that can be traced from Thales through Plato, Leibniz, Kant,
Gödel, and Husserl. Most of those writers couldn’t have
survived YA editing, either, so I suppose if you enjoy this book
(and I did), you have to be glad there are editors who will
allow the kind of digressions that turn this from a 350 page
novel to a 900 page tome. I do hope someone finds a middle
ground some day, though.

So how am I going to vote?

I don’t know. Part of why I wrote this was to see if I could
figure it out. Here’s what I’m leaning to right now; I may
change my mind before I actually vote.

  • Anathem
  • Little Brother
  • Zoe’s Tale
  • The Graveyard Book
  • No Award
  • Saturn’s Children


http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B001QXC48Q&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0060530928&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0765319853&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0765356198&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr


http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=0061474096&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr


http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B000JQUMPI&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

Potato Blight hits New England

The email from my farm
share this morning includes a warning that there have been
early signs in New England of a disease called “Late Blight”,
which is what caused the Irish Potato Famine. It includes
information about what to do if you notice things wrong with your
potatoes and tomatoes. You can read the whole article at The
University of Vermont Extension Site.

The symptoms that develop on tomato leaves, stems and fruit are quite dramatic, and are very obvious to the naked eye. The infected areas on leaves appear to be water-soaked, varying in size from a nickel up to a quarter, often beginning at leaf tips or edges. They proliferate when
the foliage has been exposed to watering, rainfall, or heavy overnight dews. If these infected areas dry out quickly, they may appear lime-green or beige in color.

The edge of the water-soaked area, either on the top or bottom of the leaf surface, will be covered with white fungal growth (mycelium) that contains the spore inoculum (visible with a hand lens). Spores are easily blown to surrounding areas and infect plants and even weed
species, in the plant family Solanaceae (the black nightshade family).

Brown to almost black lesions appear on infected stems, and the same lesions will develop on fruit, either directly on the infected plants, or a few days after they are sitting on your kitchen counters.

Please inspect your tomato and potato plants on a daily basis! If Late Blight symptoms are already appearing on plants in your garden, these plants should be removed immediately and put in a plastic bag for disposal. Don’t just put the removed plants in a compost pile as spores
will still spread from this debris. Your neighbors, not to mention commercial growers, will appreciate your taking this action immediately.

What I should be doing on the new site

I started the laymusic.org site before there
was such a thing as a Content Management System for a website. I
thought I was being pretty sophisticated by having it database
backed.

SerpentPublications.org
would indeed not be up yet if I hadn’t done that, but there’s
still a lot of stuff about the books and about why I do what I do
that’s in basic html at laymusic.org, and should be moved into wordpress.

I didn’t expect it to be that hard, because I’m using the raw-html
plugin for wordpress. So I was thinking that all I had to do was
to put two html comments around my html and put it in as a
wordpress post.

This is true as far as it goes, but consider the following
complications:

Links within the html
The content of the link has to be moved to the new site, and
the link has to be updated. This is easy enough on a one-by-one
basis, but doing thirty of them at once is a pain. I think I’m
not putting most of the pictures into the WordPress media
library; it’s just too much easier to copy them to a directory
and link to them there.
Links to the page
Until you’ve put the page into wordpress, you don’t know
what the link is going to be, and you don’t want to change any
links until you’ve published the new page. This means you have
to start at the bottom of the tree, and the set of links-to
relationships between my html pages is not a simple tree graph.
Redirect the page on the old site to the one on the new
site
A lot of people link to the old site, and I haven’t yet
gotten around to telling them all to change it, and when I do,
they’ll take their time about changing their links, at least if
they’re anything like me. So I want to keep the pages on the
old site, but have them redirect to the new site. This is
another thing I can’t do until I’ve published the page on the
new site, but want to do right afterward, since I’m doing a fair
amount of improving things as I move them, so I don’t want
people reading the old, inferior stuff when they could be
reading the new, improved stuff.

On a cheerful note, the new site is as much easier to make
additions to as I hoped it would be. On the old site, I would
spend a morning doing the additions after I’d made several of
them, but with the new site, I just do a “make upload” when I’ve
proofread a piece and think it isn’t too embarrassing.

What’s being downloaded

Yesterday I
wrote about how I was keeping track of which blog posts get read
the most. That was so much fun that I’ve also been keeping track
of what pieces on the
Serpent Publications Site are being downloaded.

It’s also fun, but a bit more irritating. Most of the old
stuff that people are still reading on my blog is fairly good
stuff (most notably the Bread machine
brioche post, which is almost three years old, but I really
haven’t changed the way I do it, and it’s still something I like
bringing to places and people still ask me for the recipe).

Unfortunately, a lot of the music people are downloading from
Serpent Publications is my really early attempts at getting music
notation software to print unbarred parts, and isn’t anything like
as good as what I can do now.

So if I ever get this website migration under control, one of
the things I’m going to be doing is taking the stuff that people
are interested in and fixing it up to the current standard.

Another problem is that the most downloaded piece is a not very
interesting drinking round, called Tom
Jolly’s Nose. It’s the most downloaded because it’s
by a man named Henry Aldrich, so in the alphabetical list by
composer he comes first, even before the really popular
“anonymous”. I’m still producing the most downloaded list in the
sidebar by hand, and I’ve thought about cheating and just not
listing that one, since anyone who wants it can see it right at
the top of the page anyway. I am cheating and giving the Drinking
Songs book address instead of the composer, since that will
lead to other songs of interest to someone who wants that one,
whereas clicking on Henry Aldrich will only give you another link
to Tom Jolly’s Nose.

But most of the other pieces on the most downloaded list are
real big hits that people who come to the site actually are
probably interested in seeing.

The reason some of the older ones are downloaded most often is
that they were the ones I wanted to typeset first, and
so people like me want to download them first. And a lot of them have
been updated, even if they aren’t this year’s latest and greatest
typesetting.

One third down

I started this project of posting something to my blog every
day on February 25, four months ago. So if it ends up being a one-year
project, it’s one third done.

I have been successful at making a post every day. The only
one that was a real “I can’t post today” post was last Saturday.
And I really was over half way done with a fairly long and
difficult post which I really did post the next day. John Scalzi, one of my
role models for doing this, is known for posting a picture of
his cat when he doesn’t feel like writing, but he’s also done,
“I don’t feel like writing today” posts.

You as readers can tell better than I can how well it’s worked
for entertaining the readers, but there do seem to be some
readers. I started keeping track of how many hits things have
gotten in April sometime. And it looks like even the most
inconsequential posts get a couple of dozen readers, and the
ones that get hit by a search, or have been pointed to in a
large mailing list, get hundreds.

Speaking as a writer, it has done some of what I wanted it to
— I now know a lot more than I did a few months ago how to pick
a subject I can write about in less than an hour, and how to
polish the 20-30 minutes of writing into coherence and then stop
and publish.

I was thinking it would be possible to see what the blogging
has done for my writing by reading the blogs from the Boston
Early Music Festival two years ago
and this
year. Actually, there wasn’t as much difference in quality
of writing as I’d hoped for. The editing was definitely better
this year, and I think I’m more comfortable letting my
personality come out now. The quantity was definitely more two
years ago, but I remember that quantity as being very
difficult. This year I just decided it wasn’t possible to blog
and do 11 PM concerts and do morning concerts, so I just didn’t
do anything in the morning.

One disappointment about the blog as a way to connect with
people is that there really isn’t as much feedback as with the
other kinds of internet writing I do. If you post to a mailing
list or email a friend, it immediately becomes obvious if you haven’t
made your point. If you write a post on your blog, it’s quite
likely that you won’t get any comments at all. But it looks
like my audience has doubled in the last four months, so maybe
if I keep going I’ll eventually get an audience that
comments.

In terms of using the numbers of readers as a guide to what to
post about, it’s pretty inconclusive. It looks like of the easy
categories, the ones about food are read more than the ones
about the garden. The ones about using technology are also read
pretty often, probably because it’s something that people are
used to using google as a way to find answers for.

Another thing I hoped to accomplish was writing about my
experiences being involved in Bonnie’s death. That has
certainly happened more than it would have otherwise, but less
than I expected. This is partly because I still don’t have the
knack of breaking that subject up into small enough topics that
I can make those posts easy ones. Maybe I’ll get better at
it. Or maybe I’ll clear more time for hard posts, but that
doesn’t sound very likely. I’m still in the throes of the Serpent Publications
websiteredesign, and when that’s done, I’ll have to move on
to redesigning this site.

The posts about books and movies are usually pretty easy, and
seem to get read fairly often. For the
most read one, about Little Dorrit, I
took the precaution of taking brief notes over the week or so I
was reading the book, so I ended up with several interesting
things already written. I should try to be more organized about
doing that.

One surprising thing is that none of the people who actually
know me personally seems to read the blog regularly. This
actually makes it easier — I don’t use anyone’s actual name
when I write about them, but I certainly sometimes say enough to
make it clear to someone who knows my friends who I’m talking
about.

So, Gentle Reader, do let me know what you think. If there’s a
topic you’d like more (or fewer) posts about, let me know. If
you’d rather have pictures of Sunny or the garden than “I can’t
post today” posts, let me know. If I’m being completely
incomprehensible about something, tell me and I’ll try to clarify.