Earplugs: should music be hazardous to your hearing?

I started thinking this diatribe when I ran into a jazz
musician friend and asked him, “How are you?”, and he replied, “I
just got a new set of earplugs.” He realized that wouldn’t be an
exciting part of most people’s weeks, but for him being able to
both talk to the other musicians in his band and listen to what
they were playing without having his ears damaged was a major
improvement in his life.

I’ve run it by a lot of musician friends since, and haven’t
heard anything that seems like a valid counterargument to me.
Naturally, this has done nothing to change the number
of places I’m glad I have my earplugs along, or sorry I don’t have
them with me.

I basically think that if both the performers and the audience
need earplugs to listen to the music safely, it’s too loud.

I understand that if you’re playing acoustic music in a large
venue, it might be a good idea for some of the performers to need
the earplugs so that the audience has a chance to hear the whole
sound.

But if it’s amplified music in a normal sized room, there’s no
reason the volume level can’t be kept to one that doesn’t do
permanent damage to anyone’s ears.

So what kind of earplugs do I need?

For casual listening, those cheap
foam ones
that come in boxes of 200 are probably good enough,
although if you spend a lot of time listening to loud
music, you might need something better.

If you need to both hear conversations and listen carefully to
the loud music, you’re better off with something designed
specifically for that purpose. After being too close to a loud
cymbal crash in the band a year ago, I bought a pair of these.

If you buy directly from the
manufacturer
, you can get a quantity discount on more than 4
pairs. I didn’t do that, but there have been a couple of times
when I wished my pair were in my backpack, and not in my tuba
accessories pouch.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B000F6V1IE&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B0015WJQ7A&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

What’s a recorder society?

The
other day,
I glossed over the description of what I was
doing for the Boston Recorder
Society
(BRS) in 2002, so I thought I’d expand on that for this
post. Since it’s been on my mind, I’ll tell you some of what I
was doing that the current organization isn’t.

Note that all of this is from the publicity, and a bit of
hearsay from people who are still going — I haven’t actually been
to a meeting for over a year.

For the 6 years I was involved in putting together the program
and the publicity (2002 through 2007), there were a couple of points I always
had to argue with the rest of the committee:

  1. Describing the classes in terms of the music being played
    rather than the level of players in them.
  2. Having a class open to players of other instruments.

I also made it really easy to volunteer to help out with the
work of the organization, set up a concert series, and published
the names of the board members, both on the web and in the
newsletter.

Class Descriptions

This is the more important of the two points. Here’s a
description from the 2006 brochure, which I compiled:

16th Century Italian Madrigals with
Héloïse Degrugillier (9 meetings)
Play some of the most dramatic music of the
renaissance. This class will explore the
madrigals of Da Rore, Arcadelt, and others.
We will work on ensemble skills, expressive
playing, and fundamental recorder technique.

And here’s the description of the class taught by the same
coach on the current website:

Heloise Degrugillier (group C)
Players should know at least three instruments, play “alto up”, be fluent with cut time and eighth note beats, and be comfortable reading one on a part.

If you wanted to pass tests and validate yourself by moving up
to a more “advanced” group, I can see that you might prefer the
second class, but if you wanted to play music with people who were
excited about it, and you didn’t already know the people involved,
I can’t imagine why you’d even think of going to a class with the
current description.

Now you can make an argument that when I was doing the
brochure, many people were insecure about deciding from the
brochure what class they wanted to take, because I didn’t usually
say anything at all about the level of playing required for the
class. Thus some peole worried
that they wouldn’t be able to do what the class expected. Other
people worried that they’d be stuck in a class with people who
couldn’t play very well.

My contention always was that the coaches should make the
decision about whether the people who wanted to take their class
were capable of playing the music. And since we believed that a
class shouldn’t run unless at least 6 people signed up for it,
anything we said about how advanced everyone in the class was
going to be was usually a lie, because it was rare that there were
really 6 advanced players who wanted to take the same class.

And a further argument in favor of not describing the levels in
the brochure is that people weren’t really deciding what class to
take from the brochure, because the September meeting was always a
“shopping” meeting, where you could meet the coaches and see what
the classes were like. This seems like a better way to decide
than by counting how many instruments the other members of the
class could play.

Other instruments

The main reason I always pushed for a class that allowed other
instruments besides recorders is that I really wanted the BRS to
be an organization that served all the recorder players in the
Boston area. When I joined, there were a couple of advanced
recorder players who were coming and mostly playing Dulcian (an
ancestor of the bassoon), and I benefitted a lot from being able
to play with them.

A secondary reason is that there’s a lot of really good
recorder music that wouldn’t historically have been played in an
all-recorder ensemble, so having viols or dulcians does in fact
make the recorder playing experience better than it would be with
only recorders.

In fact, although the current class descriptions don’t make it
clear who’s invited, the current organization does believe they
should welcome the “right kind” of other instruments. Their
statement says:

No more loud instruments
We are sorry to announce that we will no longer be accepting loud instruments in our ensembles (including serpents, shawms, and krummhorns).

There is apparently somewhere a slightly longer list of
proscribed instruments, but it specifically does not include
cello, which is the other non-recorder instrument which someone’s
actually been bringing. As played at recorder society meetings
I’ve been to, the cello player is at least as loud as the serpent player, and a
less good sightreader of Renaissance rhythms than the krumhorn
player.

So in my opinion, that decision probably has to do with
considerations other than musical ones.

But we already knew that based on the way they describe their classes.

So what is a recorder society?

When I was on the board (including the two years I was the
administrator), I thought
it should be an organization that brought together all the
recorder players in the area of whatever level.

This is why I ran things the way I did.

The current organization has decided that it’s an organization
that lets the established coaches coach the players who want a
once-a-month playing opportunity. Note that this offers nothing
to either the less-experienced professionals or to the advanced
amateurs who want more serious ensemble-playing opportunities, and
it’s unclear how much it does for beginners who need to get their
first ensemble experience.

All the coaches they’ve hired are good musicians and good teachers, and although
you couldn’t tell that from their descriptions, if you sign up for
their classes, you will probably learn something from them.

This Sunday, September 20, is their first meeting of the year, so
if what they’re offering is what you want, you should go.

If you want anything else out of a recorder society, you should
probably look elsewhere. I don’t see any reason why a recorder
player who isn’t interested in the monthly meetings should feel
any desire to join to support their other work, because if there
is any other work, I don’t see it. If you want to do any other
work, I don’t see any suggestion of where you would go to
volunteer.

Real program for Sunday’s event

This isn’t the post I promised you this morning. That one’s
going to take a bit more than one day to write. This is a
followup to this
post,
with the complete program.

Lower Highlands Historic Downtown Neighborhood Association

Arts Around the Block
The Classical Venue
Program

Church of the Holy Spirit, 160 Rock Street, Fall River
Sunday September 20, 2009 12:30 – 4

Chapel:

1: Judith Conrad
playing 17th century Neopolitan Virginals
Fantasia in C; Balletto del Granduca; Mein Junges Leben Hat ein End;
Fantasia ut re mi fa sol la
JAN PIETERSZOON SWEELINCK
Capriccio on La Girometta; 2 Canzone, La Bergamasca GIROLAMO
FRESCOBALDI
1:30: Laura Conrad,
Two ornamented renaissance standards by Diego
Ortiz, G-alto Recorder accompanied on Italian
Virginals Douce Memoire, O Felici Occhi Miei
2:00 Paolo Do Carmo
17th century Spanish Vihuela Music, early
gut-strung guitar
SONETO ENRIQUEZ DE VALDERRABANO
PAVANA I , II, III, FANTASIA LUIZ MILAN
FANTASIA VI, VII KYRIE DE LA MISSA BEATA VIRGINE DE JOSQUIN
GLOSADO ALONSO DE MUDARRA
FANTASIA, FANTASIA, GARDAME LAS VACAS, TRES DIFERENCIAS POR OTRA
PARTE LUIS DE NARVAES
2:30 Dr. Alan Powers
Reading From his own works

Sanctuary – Classical music:

2 Mike Shand
on Traverso Georg Philipp Telemann Flute Sonata in G
minor
2:15 Jagan Nath Singh Khalsa
J. S. Bach violin Sonata in E
Judith Conrad
music of Frederick Chopin. He was born 200 years
ago this coming March 1
Waltz in Eâ™­; Nocturne in Dâ™­; Mazurka in c# minor; Third Scherzo; Album
Leaf; Revolutionary Etude
3: Peter and the Wolf by Sergei Prokofiev.
Led at the keyboard by
Judith Conrad (who also plays the Wolf), Jagan Nath Singh Khalsa,
Violin as Peter, Ruth Shand, Bassoon as Grandfather, Mike Shand,
Baroque Flute as the bird, Dan Moniz, Clarinet as the Cat, Carroll
Grillo Brown, Alto Saxophone as the Duck, Alan Powers, Narrator.

Outside by the wall behind the cemetery (weather and noise level
permitting):

12:30 Laura Conrad
English Country Dances for recorder
1:30: Professor Emeritus Alan Powers
declaims great poetry of the
western world
2:30: Mike Shand
playing an unaccompanied flute Partita by J, S, Bach
3:30 The Fall River Fipple Fluters:
The Night Watch by Anthony Holborne
Mozart Trio
Folk Songs from the British Isles (The Banks of Allen Waters,
Flow Gently Sweet Afton, Dashing Away with the Smoothing
Iron, All Through the Night, Londonderry Air)
Dowland Now O Now I Needs Must Part

Performers

Judith Conrad
is here playing Piano, Virginals (an oblong
harpsichord-like keyboard instrument from 400 years ago which was the
favorite instrument of Queen Elizabeth the First of England) and
Recorders. A resident of Fall River, she is a graduate of Harvard
University and performs widely on keyboard instruments, most recently
at the Boston Early Music Festival, at the Loring-Greenough House in
Jamaica Plain, in Philadelphia and in Magnano, Italy.
Jagan Nath Singh Khalsa
studied violin in Chicago and in St. Louis.
He is a member of the Sikh ashram community in Millis, MA. His love
of music extends to orchestral, chamber music, and most especially
music for church. He also teaches violin and plays in local community
theater shows.
Mike Shand,
a physicist by trade, has studied traverso for over ten
years with Wendy Rolfe, Linda Marianiello, Anne Brigg, and Sandy
Miller. He has performed solo and in ensembles in northern New Jersey
and, more recently, in Newport, RI. He recently moved from New Jersey
to Tiverton. He is a graduate of Durfee High School.
Laura Conrad,
also a Durfee High graduate, now lives in Cambridge MA
where she directs the Cantabile Renaissance Band and studies recorder
with John Tyson. She is the webmaster for Laymusic.org and
SerpentPublications.org, two websites which support musicians who play
Renaissance Music in small groups. She is playing recorder today; she
also plays serpent, an ancestor of the tuba which was widely used as
the loudest bass instrument available between 1600 and 1850.
Paolo Do Carmo
studied classical guitar in his native Rio De Janeiro,
and has taken up early music since moving to Fall River 11 years
ago. He is playing a Vihuela today, which is an early Spanish
guitar. He also plays recorders and lute and makes instruments. He is
currently finishing a theorbo.
Ruth Shand
is the longest-serving member of the Fall River Symphony. A
former Somerset music teacher and a concert pianist, she is playing
bassoon for us today.
Dan Moniz,
a Swansea resident, is the first-chair clarinettist in the
Swansea Community Musicians.
Carroll Grillo Brown,
a Fall River resident, plays all sizes of saxophones.
The Fall River Fipple Fluters
are an amateur recorder-playing group
founded in 1991 by Judith Conrad. They play together for fun every
Friday at Four-thirty in Fall River. New members are always welcome,
willingness to try to learn recorder is the only requirement. They
play all sizes of recorder and many different styles of music, the
core repertoire being Western classical music from the 16th to the
18th centuries, the heyday of the recorder.

For further information
call Judith Conrad, 508-674-6128 or e-mail her at
judithconrad@mindspring.com

Pretending to go a Maying

The new piece the Cantabile
Renaissance Band
played last night was by Thomas
Morley
from the Triumphs
of Oriana.
This is a collection of madrigals by most of the
famous composers of the day (1603). They must have been the sort
of music that was played for Queen Elizabeth when she went to
visit her nobles to keep them spending their money on
conspicuous consumption rather than on raising armies to rebel
against her.

You can read what I said about the music on the
Serpent Publications Blog
, but we found the words
interesting as well, particularly the lines:

A Prince,
of beauty rich and rare,
for her delighting,
Pretends to goe a Maying,

We weren’t quite sure what that meant. One idea that occured
to us during the beer-drinking part of the meeting, where we
were discussing our gardens, was that it wasn’t May, but the
prince had too much zucchini in his garden, so he was leaving
them on his neighbors’ doorsteps and ringing the doorbell and
then running away.

Another idea I had was that it was the kind of Maying that led
to teenage pregnancy that he was pretending to do, which the
Queen wouldn’t have really wanted to do, but might have enjoyed
having a beautiful man pretend to want to do it with her.

In any case, your guess is at least as good as mine, so feel
free to leave your ideas in the comments.

Tablature and lilypond

If all you’re doing is entering notes, you can probably take
lilypond from 15 years ago, run it through the automatic updater,
and get your music typeset by current lilypond, using all the
improvements made by all the developers since then.

If you have lyrics, they did something 8 years or so ago that
the automatic upgrader doesn’t deal with, so you have to manually
change two or three lines per part to use the current version. This is why there’s still a
lot of old lilypond on my music publishing
site
. But it’s certainly possible to use 10 year old work
with current lilypond.

If you want tablature, someone who actually has tablature may
have figured out something better than what I can see. What it
looks like from here is:

  • Some time in 2003, I spend some time figuring out how I
    would have to enter Dowland’s tablature if that were what I
    wanted to do. I actually had a measure or two entered, and I
    got some help writing a scheme function so that it would look
    more like what’s printed in the Dowland facsimiles. I didn’t at
    the time have any real use for the tablature, so I didn’t bother
    entering more than that measure. However, in 2007 I decided a
    few of the Dowland third book pieces didn’t really make sense
    musically without the lute part, so I attempted to enter the
    tablature, and found that all the work I’d done 4 years before
    was useless. I translated the tablature into standard notation,
    and didn’t do anything about having it as tablature.
  • This last week, someone from the recorder mailing
    list
    offered to help me proofread tablature, so I took a
    look at what lilypond has now. It would clearly be a fair amount of
    work to get from the notation I have (for a few pieces) to
    anything that looks like what Dowland printed, but I found a post
    on the LUTE
    mailing list
    from last year claiming that they had something
    useful. However, this may have worked with lilypond 2.10, but it
    no longer works with lilypond 2.12.

Now I didn’t spend a lot of time figuring out what has changed
about tablature between 2.10 and 2.12, and it could be that it’s a
trivial problem that just didn’t get into convert-ly by accident,
and if I wrote a bug report it would get fixed immediately. But
since I’ve done considerable work on tablature over the years, all
of which is completely useless with current lilypond, and of
course I still have several projects on the website with a fairly
tight deadline of mid-October. So I’m not going to do any more
work right now. But if any of you feel differently, and do get to
where there’s useful French lute tablature coming out of lilypond 2.12,
please let me know about it.

Meanwhile, I should mention that abctab2ps was
already producing useful tablature 10 years ago, and has
presumably improved. I stopped using it since tablature by itself
is of limited use to me, and there wasn’t any way to get from the
abctab2ps input to standard notation. But another possibly useful
program would translate the tab (plus the tuning information) into ABC or lilypond.

Halfway through

Yesterday was my half birthday. This means two things:

  • In one year, I will be 59 1/2 and I will really own all the money in my
    retirement accounts.
  • I’m half through with this experiment in blogging every day.

I know I already told you about how I felt about being one third
down
, but I’ve had a couple of new thoughts since then, so I’ll
pass those on.

I think I’m writing some better. My current crusade is to use
the word “thing” less, and substitute a more specific noun.
I’m doing this in routine emails, as well as in these blog
posts.

I may be reading better, as a result of the fact that my
default is to write about anything I read that I really love
and want to tell people about. One of the more popular posts
on this 59’th
year experiment
was the one I wrote about Little Dorrit
after watching the BBC adaptation and rereading the book.
Part of what made that one good was that I took notes about what I
noticed and had to look up while I was reading it. I’m
currently rereading Anna
Karenina
, and I’m planning a similar post about it.

I did finally get a request from a friend to change something.
I had goofed and left his real name in some text copied from
elsewhere on the web, and my blog turned up on
the front page of a google search for his name, and he was starting a job
hunt. Of course, I immediately redacted his name. It does
prove that this blog has a higher google page rank than the
page from which I lifted the quote with his name in it.

Of the top ten most popular posts, four are about the Boston Early Music Festival. I
got a request this week from the American Recorder
Magazine
to use my blog post about the recorder
masterclass with Paul Leenhouts
, since the person who had
been assigned to cover it for them hadn’t come up with an
article.

I still don’t know much about who’s reading this blog, but the
numbers of readers are going up steadily, so someone must be
enjoying it, or finding what they search for in google on
it.

I still haven’t completely missed a day, although I admit that
days like last
Wednesday
are cheating a bit. But I had written real
content, just in other contexts from the 59’th year blogging
every day project.

How the gig went

I posted yesterday that I
had a gig in Waltham and I didn’t know much about what I was going
to play.

As is usual with gigs where you don’t know much about what’s
happening the morning of the gig, it didn’t work out to very
much playing. It wouldn’t have been worth going to Waltham for
the 5 minutes of performing time, but the rest of the performance
was entertaining, and the rehearsing with Lynn and Ishmael was really
fun. They’re both good people to play with; I play with Ishmael
all the time but usually in the context of a larger group, not all
of whom are very experienced performers, and I’ve only had a
chance to sing with Lynn a couple of times.

The original email sent to possible performers talked about
two 5 minute intermezzos and implied that there might be a fair
amount of playing time before the performance. So we rehearsed a
fair amount of stuff, and we were all prepared to fill in with
solos if something needed setup time.

When we got there, the first person we talked to said there would
be 5 minute intermezzos, but that he didn’t think he wanted before
performance music. So we arranged to get food before the
performance. (At one point there’d been a mention of food during
the rehearsal time, but that didn’t happen, and I’d gone easy on
lunch expecting an early supper, so I was hungry by 6:30.)

The second person we talked to said the intermezzos would be
3 minutes or less, but he had no problem with lots of music before
the performance. So Ishmael played fiddle tunes when he’d
finished his sandwich. I could have played too, but I’d packed my
soprano recorder when they told us there wouldn’t be
before-performance music, and I wasn’t confident enough that the
right key would come out on the G alto.

So we ended up doing Ravenscroft’s
We
be three poor Mariners
for the first intermezzo, but being cut
off before we could follow it up with To
Portsmouth
and He
that will an alehouse keep
, which would have been a 5 minute
set, or maybe a little more.

The second intermezzo was supposed to be Jenny went to
gather rushes
, sung by Lynn with me and Ishmael chiming in
on the choruses to encourage the audience, and maybe doing an
instrumental verse if Lynn needed to catch her breath, followed by me and
Ishmael playing one or two Morley
Canzonets
to two voyces
, but the actors popped out during the last verse
of Jenny.

Ishmael’s friend who came along and hasn’t had much experience
of this kind of thing was quite annoyed at how truncated the
performing was, but Ishmael, Lynn and I had really been
expecting it. I was surprised during rehearsal when Lynn
suggested we sing Purcell,
since he’s a good 200 years later than the play, but she denied
that she’d ever suggested we do it in performance — she says
she just said I
gave her cakes and I gave her ale
is fun to sing, which it is, so we burst into song..

You’ll have to read my other blogs again

I really find on Wednesday that if I fix all the problems with the music
that the Cantabile Band
played the previous night, and get it uploaded, and maybe blog
about it on the Serpent
Publications blog
, I don’t really have the time or energy to
write a completely unrelated post for the 59th year
blogging experiment.
So the way I did a week or so
ago,
I’m just going to point you at the writing I’ve
already done. Even if you aren’t interested in the Renaissance
music, read the Chidiock_Tichborne
article.

So here’s the report on last
night’s meeting
, and the description
of the pieces I uploaded this morning.

West Gallery Quire Workshop

This is about the workshop I
attended on Tuesday, August 11, 2009, directed by Francis Roads. Here’s the music we played.
I had intended to write this yesterday, but got lazy, and let
A.A. Milne do the post for me. Now I’m
glad I did because it gave me a chance to talk to one of the other
attendees yesterday afternoon.

First the good things.

  • There were about 40 people, including a
    number who had never played West Gallery music before.
  • There was
    a really good section of bass singers, which is what the serpent
    really likes.
  • The ratio of singers to instruments was higher than
    it usually is at our regular meetings, which is probably both
    better musically and more authentic to the tradition.
  • The tempos Francis Roads picked were much brisker than the
    ones we usually play, and this did give us some better idea of the
    relationship of the music to dance music than we usually get.
  • I brought flyers for both the Cantabile Renaissance
    Band
    and the Serpent Publications
    Website
    , and lots of them disappeared. In fact, the Serpent
    Publications ones were all gone, and I should have made more than
    I did.

Some things that future workshop organizers might want to think
about:

  • This was the hardest serpent playing I’ve ever done. Some
    of that was because a couple of songs were in really difficult
    keys for a D serpent. Since most serpents in this century are
    in C, that probably wasn’t something Francis Roads would have
    known. Another thing that made it harder was that he spent the
    first 15 minutes we were playing trying to improve the balance,
    by making both the instruments and the basses not stand out as
    much. This meant that I was playing in difficult keys, softer
    and more staccato than I was used to. There was even one piece
    with difficult fingerings that I should have practiced harder.
    This is unusual in vocal music, since most people who play a
    brass instrument at all can play arpeggios faster than most
    singers can sing them.
  • The friend I discussed the workshop with yesterday had been
    in England for the Ironbridge workshop last spring. The pace of
    Tuesday’s workshop seemed quite fast compared with what we’re
    used to, but she said the people in England go even faster.
    They’d have been through all the verses by the time we got
    through with the first verse. I think the level of music
    education in the general population there isn’t much if any
    better than it is here, but the people who’ve been to those
    choir schools are really good choral sightreaders.
  • Logistically, putting the music on the chairs didn’t really
    improve anything, since enough people had printed their own to
    practice from that it kept having to be moved to the floor.
  • It wasn’t possible to organize an optimal seating plan.
    There were three incompatible influences on the seating plan
    that actually happened:

    1. The singers will sometimes stand up, since they sing
      better that way, but some of the instruments can’t be played
      standing up, so in general you want to put the instruments
      in front of the singers.
    2. The people who aren’t good sightreaders should be in
      front of the people who are, so that they can hear them
      better.
    3. People who are doing something new to them that they
      aren’t sure they’re going to be able to handle sometimes
      prefer to hide in the back rows.

I’m glad we had the workshop. West Gallery Music
is a form that should be better known and more widely used and
this workshop contributed to that happening.

Digitizing Vinyl

I had some vacation ideas, none of which seems to be happening,
so I’m feeling like I deserve to spend some money on something.
I’ve looked at some knitting books, and surround sound systems,
and ordering gourmet spices and chocolates.
This morning what seems to be itching is the idea of digitizing
my collection of LP’s.

I was buying LP’s from 1968 when I went to college until about
1988 when I bought a CD player. For some of that time I was
making reasonable amounts of money, and when I wasn’t I was
living near record stores with $.99 sale bins, and that was the
period when my musical tastes were forming. So having my CD’s
digitized and easily accessible on the computer is good, but it
would be a bigger contribution to being in touch with my
personal history if I had the LP’s.

I was convinced enough that I wanted to do this to dig up the
right set of cables to put the output of my stereo system into a
computer sound card, when it turned out that my turntable from
1973 was pretty sick. I kicked it a while, and when it didn’t
get better I put it out for the trash on a Wednesday afternoon.
(Trash collection is on Thursday in this part of the world, but
electronic devices don’t usually last that long on this busy
street near MIT and Kendall Square.)

At the BLU
meeting
Wednesday night, someone said that they had
digitized their videotapes by buying a gadget that copied them
to cd’s and then ripping the CD’s to their computer. It really
seems like that’s the way to go for LP’s, too.

So I currently have this in my Amazon
shopping cart. I may convince myself that this isn’t what to
spend money on, or that I won’t want to spend the time putting
the LP’s on the turntable and labeling the CD’s. But for now,
that’s what’s next on the toy-buying list.

I have a further fantasy that I can rent it for small amounts
of money, or gift bottles of wine, and that when I’ve digitized
the records some of them can be sold. But I certainly wouldn’t
spend the money if I couldn’t afford it without monetizing it.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B001MZTZCG&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr