Author: Laura Conrad

Last post about setting up the new home theater

Not that I mightn’t complain about the new home theater, but I
now consider it set up, so future posts will be about interface
inadequacy or something.

I decided to stop plugging things in and out until the new DVI
cables arrived, and set up the disk player with a regular stereo
connection, and used the TOSLink cable to link the cable box to
the receiver.

This morning all the HDMI cables arrived, and it turns out that
even with all the equipment in front of me and turned around so I
could see the back, I had ordered the wrong cables.

Cable TV

I could have sworn I saw an HDMI socket on the back of the
cable box, but it isn’t there now. So I have connected the cable
box with the composite video cables and the TOSLink audio to the
receiver. This is on AV1, which is the input that’s selected when
you push the “TV” button on the receiver.

Broadcast TV

I don’t currently watch this much, but if I were to downgrade
my cable, or if there were a really good audio program on one of
the broadcast channels that’s not in HD on the cable box, I would
like the option of watching via broadcast. Right now that audio
isn’t hooked up, so I can only listen through the TV speakers; if
I get another TOSLink cable I’ll be able to hook that to the
receiver and listen to it from whatever other input has the
digital audio connection.

DVD

The new Blu-Ray DVD player with the network connection was a
pain in the neck when I didn’t have the two HDMI cables, but “just
works” when you’ve connected it via HDMI to the receiver. I don’t
have a Blu-Ray disk to test, but the surround sound was working
fine with the DVD I played.

Computer

This I haven’t tested, but it’s hooked up to the receiver via a
DVI-HDMI cable and a regular stereo audio cable. I don’t know how
much I’ll be using this for, since the DVD player will play
netflix watch now and youtube (untested). The firewire cable I
ordered turns out to be the wrong kind, so I can’t test what
channels the cable box is putting out on firewire.

Not really done yet

So I still have to buy some more cables, and set up the fancy
remote control to know about the new equipment, and tell netflix
to send me blu-ray disks and run the program that sets up the
receiver based on putting a microphone in your listening
location. But it’s definitely ready to start giving demos.

Report on the October 20, 2009 meeting

We played:

Schedule

We will be having our usual dropin meeting next Tuesday at
7:45 PM at my
place.

There is some interest in having a meeting on Tuesday, November
3, at Stuart’s place in Somerville. Let me or Stuart know if you
want to do that, since we’ll have to move some music to his place,
and we’ll move a better selection if we know who’s coming.

December 8 and January 19 also have elections, so we will
either not meet or meet elsewhere those dates.

We may also miss one or two more meetings in December. We’ll
make up for it by having a party. It looks like the best day for
that is Sunday, December 20, but if this is a terrible day for too
many people we’ll look at other days. So let me know if you want
to come to the party and that’s a bad day.

Other events

The group (me, Anne and Ishmael) that performed last Spring at
the Walk
for Hunger will be playing a short concert on Thursday,
December 17 at 2 PM in the Rabb Lecture Hall at the Boston Public
Library.

“The Baroque Cycle” by Neal Stephenson

You would expect a 3000 page novel about the men who invented
natural philosophy in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth
centuries to occasionally get tedious, as characters explain the
difference between Leibnitzian Monads and atoms to each other.

It sometimes does, but it’s well-written enough that you care
enough about the characters to put up with it. (Think about the
long essays about the nature of history in War and
Peace — you keep reading to find out what happens to
Pierre and Natasha anyway.)

Actually, the comparison with War
and Peace isn’t far-fetched at all — I’m sure
Tolstoy’s intended audience for his disaster novel was
interested in the question of how history would have been
different if Napoleon hadn’t had a cold at the battle of
Borodino. Neal Stephenson’s audience is interested in how
alchemy turned into modern physics. Both audiences want to read
about the mud and stench on the battlefields as well as the
high-level strategy and tactics that led to the battle.

The action of this novel takes place on 5 continents and
numerous islands; the characters vary in social standing from
slaves to King Louis XIV of France; they invent not only
ingenious methods for winning battles, but the modern banking
system and long-distance shipping; the details of organization
of the places they live, from palaces to jail cells, are
meticulously described.

In other words, there’s plenty of material for a 3000 page
novel, so if you’re interested in at least half of it, you’ll
enjoy reading it.

I criticized
the ebook preparation a couple of weeks ago. I want to pick one
nit about the writing.

The typical bodice-ripper, with just the stuff about eighteenth
century life that everybody knows, lasts about 250 pages, and I
don’t often get through even that much. In order to justify
3000 pages, the reader has to really believe in the
meticulousness of the research. Not that all the writing has to
be in the style of the eighteenth century, but the willing
suspension of disbelief becomes harder when the author is unable
to resist glaring anachronisms like this:

Again, Mother, almost the whole point of mistresses is
that they may be hot-swapped.

I’m sure that character would have used current technological
jargon in gossiping about court liaisons, but Stephenson really
should have resisted twentyfirst century technological jargon.

http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B002MTU5BQ&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr
http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=laymusicorg-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=1400079985&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr

Today’s the day for the DNS move

I started writing this a while ago, and got hung up on
.htaccess documentation.

In any case, I started by forwarding all the email from the old
ISP to a gmail account, so that the DNS change won’t screw that up.

I’ve also copied all the files over from the old account to the
new account. I think I have most of the links I need.

So soon, I’m going to tell the new ISP that it’s hosting the
laymusic.org domain, and tell the registrar that the DNS is now
with the new ISP.

I will then as quickly as possible tell the new ISP where to
look for some of the things that aren’t where it might expect.

I’m sure I’ll eventually get things set up right; if they
disappear for a few minutes, or even a couple of hours, don’t
worry about it.

If there’s something you want that’s been gone for more than a
day, you should let me know.

Musick’s Recreation: Seventeenth-century English music for lute and viol

I went to this concert last night because a friend had an extra
ticket. It’s the first concert on this
series, and I recommend you check them out. You can catch the
same concerts at
the Somerville Museum.

Carol Lewis, viols, and Chris
Henriksen are married, and have been performing together for
several decades. It’s a nice combination, because both
instruments can be used either solo or as accompaniment, and both
performers are good at both roles.

Last night’s concert was about the lute and viol music people
in London were playing during the tumultuous years of the early Stuarts,
the Commonwealth under Cromwell, and the Restoration. Chris said
he’d done a lot of music from this period before, but always
looked at it from the point of view of what was happening at
court. This time, he realized that London was at that time one of
the few places in Europe (Hamburg was another) where there was a
thriving music scene independant of the court, with nobles and
even well-off commoners paying professional performers and
composers for lessons on viol, lute and guitar.

A lot of these same composers also wrote for recorder, so I was
familiar with a lot of the names. One revelation was a composer
named Thomas Mace (ca. 1612 — 1684), who wrote one of the
latest lute method books, Musicke’s Monument in
1676. The Saraband that Chris played from that was
the jazziest piece on the program.

I really enjoyed the music; both performers are very good;
I wish they got a slightly more animated audience. I couldn’t see
anyone else laughing at the jokes in this extremely witty music,
and several audience members were clearly asleep.

More on squash pudding

I’m roasting squash so that I can make a squash
pudding. Squash is one of the things I get a lot of from my
farm share. I’m going
to try baking it in mini-muffin tins with paper cups, to make it a
bit more like finger food.

I have to bring something to a friend’s house this afternoon.
She’s been having surgery and other therapy for cancer, so she
hasn’t been getting to all the singing events that are normally a
big part of her life, so she’s invited people over. She says:

George and I will provide
beverages; we’d be very happy if you would bring snacks. (Bear in mind
that because of my condition this will be an abbreviated event, so
don’t bring anything elaborate. We just need something to munch on.)

Unfortunately, except for carrots, the farm share hasn’t been
giving me much finger food. It was better in the summer, with
cucumbers and green beans. I thought about squash muffins, but
I’ve really been enjoying the pudding, so I wanted to make
that.

I figure if I bring plastic spoons the individual squash
puddings in the muffin cups won’t be very much more trouble than muffins.

Getting ready for winter

We’ve been having mild, September-like October weather, but the
last couple of days have been the dank, November-like October.

So last night, with threats of snow in the forecast, I brought
in the plants from the fire escape, and this morning I filled
the humidifier.

I thought you’d like to see some of the plants.

The basil is from a branch from the farm share that grew
roots before I could use it, so I planted it in the windowbox.

[basil in bloom]

The rosemary I just bought at the store, but it’s done well in
the windowbox. I hope it likes being indoors until Spring.

[rosemary]

Some winters here are mild enough that rosemary survives
outside, but of course then it isn’t as easy to go pick a
sprig.

I haven’t turned the heat on yet, so it’s a little early for
the humidifier, but even if I don’t turn my heat on, the
neighbors might turn theirs on and make the air drier.

Hooking up surround sound, part two

When I left this
saga yesterday at this time, I had two main problems:

  • How to connect the subwoofer? This turned out to be pretty
    easy. The connection labeled “subwoofer” on the new receiver is
    just an RCA cable, and should go to the connection labeled “from
    mono out” on the subwoofer, which I hadn’t been using so I’d
    forgotten about it. So the real problem was finding an RCA
    cable long enough and realizing that I needed to flip the switch
    to tell the subwoofer it was connected via the RCA cable and not
    the speaker wires.
  • How to connect the TV set to the receiver so that surround
    sound comes out of the TV and into the receiver? This turned
    out to be very complicated.

I had what I thought were several of the right kind of cable,
but they all turned out to be TOS-Link to Mini-TOS-link, and I
needed a TOS-link to TOS-link cable. I bought one at
MicroCenter on my way to my recorder lesson last night, and
hooked it up this morning. This led to lots of playing with
options on all kinds of devices. The bottom line is:

  • I get surround sound on Broadcast TV.
  • I get stereo on Cable TV.
  • I get stereo from the shiny new disk player.

I have checked with expert opinion, and the consensus is that
the TV set is behaving badly, and I shouldn’t depend on it to
pass through audio that it’s given from external devices.

So the upshot is that I’ve ordered several more HDMI cables
from monoprice, and when
they come, I will hook everything up through the receiver and
have it handle all the sound.

So unless broadcast TV plays something good, I still won’t be
able to tell you how I like surround sound until I get my new
cables.

Note that I haven’t addressed the issue of connecting the
computer, and I haven’t even started setting up the remote
control.

So if you’re thinking this is a small project, at least order
enough HDMI cables with your receiver. Maybe it would all “just
work” if I had done that.

Setting up the new surround sound system

The audio stuff mostly came yesterday. Of course, on Tuesdays
I don’t have time to play with new toys, and I suspected that
starting to play with this would leave the living room
discombobulated and I need to be able to have people there on
Tuesday night. So I just unpacked the boxes and put things
roughly where they’re going to go and left it for later.

Another issue is that the speaker cable I ordered with the new
toys isn’t coming tomorrow.

But setting up my new toys was what I really wanted to do, and it paralyzed me in
terms of thinking up something else to write about here this
morning, so I decided to go see if I had speaker cable in the
audio cables box, and of course I did.

So I bit the bullet and unplugged everything from the old
receiver and put the new receiver up and started plugging things
in. Getting the two existing speakers and the radio antennas
plugged in and getting stereo radio was trivial.

Plugging in the three (center and 2 surround) new speakers
turned out to be pretty easy, and now the sound from the radio
was coming out of five speakers.

It was easier after I discovered that you can actually see the
hole you need to put the speaker wire through if you put the
speaker on its face, instead of trying to wire it in place. I’m
not sure who came up with the idea of connecting speakers to
speaker wire by threading the wire through an invisible hole. I
think long-term it works better than the screws used to, but the
screws are really easier.

The subwoofer turns out to connect to the receiver via some
kind of plug I don’t have, so I couldn’t connect that. I hope I
can figure out what the name of the plug is, and get one that I
can connect to the speaker wire. The stuff that’s coming
tomorrow is coming with some plugs, but I’m pretty sure they
aren’t the right kind.

So on to connecting program sources. I started with the TV
set. Ultimately I probably want to get some HDMI cables and
connect everything that way, but I started by just plugging the
cable box into the TV the way it was before this exercise and
connecting the TV to an analog audio input on the receiver. I
was only getting sound through the two old speakers when I did
that, so I fiddled with options on the TV set menu, and stopped
getting sound through the receiver at all. I think I probably told it I was using
the digital out, and since I’m not, it isn’t sending the sound
out the analog out and so the receiver isn’t getting any. I’ll
go downstairs with a digital cable soon and check this out.

I have one hdmi cable, and I decided to use that to connect the
new blu-ray disk player to the TV set. This is working (minus the
sound), but I wasn’t able to check out the netflix, because the
remote doesn’t seem to be doing anything. And of course it’s
the kind of minimalist box with one button for power, and
everything else you do with the remote.

So basically, after a couple of hours work, I have less stuff
working than I did when I started, but it looks like all the
hardware is working right, and I just have to get it connected
right.

I’ll let you know how I like surround sound when I actually get
some.

Report on the October 13, 2009 meeting

We played:

Schedule

We will be having our usual dropin meetings on Tuesdays at
7:45 PM at my
place.

We will not be meeting on election day, November 3.
We will probably miss the othermeetings where there are elections,
i.e., December 8, and January 19.

We may also miss one or two more meetings in December. We’ll
make up for it by having a party.